Bookish: Boosting Preschoolers’ Reading Skills

My mom sent me this article from Phys.org earlier this week and included the following note in the subject line: For You Book Nerd. My Momma knows me well. This article tweaked my interest on a book nerd level, but also as a parent. I found a lot of useful ideas and results that have been thinking about how I’m reading out loud to Sammie. We point to the words sometimes while reading, but I think we will do this a bit more often now. Any book that focuses on the alphabet we usually ask her to name another word with that letter, but I’m considering starting to make the individual letter sounds to reinforce the concept.

It’s a fascinating article, so I’ve listed the text below. But also check out the actual article and the website for more interesting stuff. After reading this I would love to hear what you think about the article!

Preschoolers’ reading skills benefit from one modest change by teachers

A small change in how teachers and parents read aloud to preschoolers may provide a big boost to their reading skills later on, a new study found.

That small change involves making specific references to print in books while reading to children – such as pointing out letters and words on the pages, showing capital letters, and showing how you read from left to right and top to bottom on the page.

Preschool children whose teachers used print references during storybook reading showed more advanced reading skills one and even two years later when compared to children whose teachers did not use such references. This is the first study to show causal links between referencing print and later literacy achievement.

“Using print references during reading was just a slight tweak to what teachers were already doing in the classroom, but it led to a sizeable improvement in reading for kids,” said Shayne Piasta, co-author of the study and assistant professor of teaching and learning at Ohio State University.

“This would be a very manageable change for most preschool teachers, who already are doing storybook reading in class.”

Piasta conducted the study with lead investigator Laura Justice, professor of teaching and learning at Ohio State, as well as co-investigators Anita McGinty of the University of Virginia and Joan Kaderavek of the University of Toledo. Their results appear in the April 2012 issue of the journal Child Development.

The study is part of Project STAR (Sit Together And Read), a randomized clinical trial based at Ohio State to test the short- and long-term impacts associated with reading regularly to preschool children in the classroom.

The study involved more than 300 children in 85 classrooms who participated in a 30-week shared reading program. As a group, the children came from low-income homes, started with below-average language skills and were at substantial risk for later reading difficulties.

The children were separated into three groups: high-dose STAR (four reading sessions per week), low-dose STAR (two reading sessions per week) and a third comparison group who also had four reading sessions per week. All teachers in the three groups read the same 30 books to their students.

Teachers in the two STAR groups were trained to make specific print references while reading the books. Teachers in the comparison group were told to read as they normally would, and were not prompted to make print references.

Results showed that both one and even two years later, preschoolers in the high-dose STAR classrooms had higher word reading, spelling and comprehension skills than did children in the comparison group. The benefits were not as clear for those in the low-dose STAR classrooms, although they did seem to have slightly better skills than those children in the comparison classrooms.

Piasta said it was particularly notable that students in the high-dose STAR classrooms scored higher on tests of reading comprehension.

“If you’re getting kids to pay attention to letters and words, it makes sense that they will do better at word recognition and spelling,” she said.

“But the fact that they also did better at understanding the passages they read is really exciting. That suggests this intervention may help them become better readers.”

How do print references help preschoolers become better readers? Piasta said research suggests it helps children learn the code of letters and how they relate to words and to meaning.

“By showing them what a letter is and what a letter means, and what a word is and what a word means, we’re helping them to crack the code of language and understand how to read,” she said.

While this study shows the value of using print references with preschoolers, research suggests very few teachers and parents do this systematically, according to Piasta.

An earlier study by Justice and her colleagues showed that untrained teachers reference print about 8.5 times per reading session – compared to up to 36 times for those who were trained.

Parents are even less likely to make print references while reading to their children. One study suggests that parents use such references only about once during a typical 10-minute reading session.

“One of the best things about the power of print referencing is how easy it would be to implement during shared reading in the classroom,” Piasta said.

“Compared to a lot of interventions, this only requires a small adjustment to teachers’ typical reading style. But it pays large dividends in reading skills.”

Review: Cinderella Ate My Daughter by Peggy Orenstein

Publisher: HarperCollins
Release Date: August 22, 2011
Format: Paperback
Pages: 256
Source: Publisher

From Goodreads: The acclaimed author of the groundbreaking bestseller “Schoolgirls” reveals the dark side of pink and pretty: the rise of the girlie-girl, she warns, is not that innocent.

 Pink and pretty or predatory and hardened, sexualized girlhood influences our daughters from infancy onward, telling them that how a girl looks matters more than who she is. Somewhere between the exhilarating rise of Girl Power in the 1990s and today, the pursuit of physical perfection has been recast as a source–”the” source–of female empowerment. And commercialization has spread the message faster and farther, reaching girls at ever-younger ages.

But, realistically, how many times can you say no when your daughter begs for a pint-size wedding gown or the latest Hannah Montana CD? And how dangerous is pink and pretty anyway–especially given girls’ successes in the classroom and on the playing field? Being a princess is just make-believe, after all; eventually they grow out of it. Or do they? Does playing Cinderella shield girls from early sexualization–or prime them for it? Could today’s little princess become tomorrow’s sexting teen? And what if she does? Would that make her in charge of her sexuality–or an unwitting captive to it?

Those questions hit home with Peggy Orenstein, so she went sleuthing. She visited Disneyland and the international toy fair, trolled American Girl Place and Pottery Barn Kids, and met beauty pageant parents with preschoolers tricked out like Vegas showgirls. She dissected the science, created an online avatar, and parsed the original fairy tales. The stakes turn out to be higher than she–or we–ever imagined: nothing less than the health, development, and futures of our girls. From premature sexualization to the risk of depression to rising rates of narcissism, the potential negative impact of this new girlie-girl culture is undeniable–yet armed with awareness and recognition, parents can effectively counterbalance its influence in their daughters’ lives.

See all the sticky notes?

My review: I’m really not sure what to say about this book. Reading it left me so full of thoughts that I’m not sure I can focus on one long enough to write a coherent review. While it’s around 200 pages it really packs a power punch in the whole parenting/raising kids department. I used a ton of sticky notes in reading this book – things for future reference when Sammie grows up, statistics that shocked me, and points I had never thought of.

When we had got pregnant with Sammie I was going to do the whole gender neutral nursery and all. We did a lot of neutral clothes (primarily because I couldn’t stop buying things before we had the big sonogram) and because I personally hate wearing dresses…so on sheer principle I wasn’t going to deck my daughter out in them either. But, then we found out her gender and I went with a pinkish nursery décor. In my defense, it does have the alphabet on it and includes brown…so it’s not totally girlie-girlie.

We’ve raised her without gender specific roles – mainly because we don’t follow the norm in our house so just by example we show her that men cook (far better than this woman can!), men can clean the house too, and women can handle finances and all that goes with it. We balance our chores based on who hates what the least. Brett hates to dust – so I do it…I hate to clean bathrooms – so Brett does it.

Page 45 goes into a campaign waged by President Roosevelt regarding worry over waning birth rates. I was enraged when I read this piece (I get that it was a different time then…but still) because he thought women feared motherhood so girl’s got more dolls to play with while boys got blocks and erector sets.  I, for one, think that a man is good with babies is a pretty attractive and is a high quality when it comes to my marital expectations. Many, I would imagine, agree with this…so why is a boy playing with a doll something people (not all, of course) take issue with?

Sammie loves watching Handy Manny or Mickey Mouse Clubhouse over Disney Princess movies most of the time and dresses up in my shoes and Brett’s about evenly. But are we still sending her subliminal messages without realizing it? All of the females on Mickey Mouse wear heals and skirts. At least Kelly on Handy Manny wears pants and runs a hardware repair shop. I have long had an issue with the pinkification of toys for kids. It seriously gets under my skin. My daughter doesn’t need a pink set of dishes…she needs a set of play dishes. There generally aren’t “boy colors” so why should there be “girl colors?” When did blue, yellow, red colored toys become “boy toys?”

On page 43 the author explains that from a manufacturer’s perspective if the older child is a girl and the parents buy a pink toy when they have another kid, if it’s a boy, they will buy another exact toy in a non-pink color. REALLY? Since when is it not okay for a boy to play with a pink bat, kitchen, or anything for that matter?

When I finished this book I wanted to burn every pink thing Sammie owns but then I realized that she isn’t in a protective bubble (as much as I wish she were) so I can’t hide her from all the focus on pretty girls, princesses that are rescued instead of doing the rescuing, and unrealistic body expectations. What we can do is to reinforce that she CAN be anything she wants and we will support her – traditionally girlie or not. We will continue to shower her with examples of people crossing the lines of the gender stereotypes and will answer the hard questions when they come.

Check out these other reviews on the tour:

uesday, January 31st: Sara’s Organized Chaos
Wednesday, February 1st: Book Hooked Blog
Thursday, February 2nd: Book Addiction
Friday, February 3rd: Bloggin’ ‘Bout Books
Friday, February 3rd: Family Volley
Monday, February 6th: Good Girl Gone Redneck
Tuesday, February 7th: Diary of a Stay at Home Mom
Wednesday, February 8th: Book Club Classics!
Thursday, February 9th: Books Like Breathing
Monday, February 13th: Stephany Writes
Wednesday, February 15th: There’s a Book
Thursday, February 16th: The Scarlet Letter

Sig

Review: The Case for the Only Child: Your Essential Guide by Susan Newman

Publisher: HCI
Release Date: June 1, 2011
Format: Paperback
Pages: 288
Source: Publisher

From Goodreads: What’s really wrong with having one child? Is one enough for you? For your partner? What constitutes a complete, happy family? Will your only child be lonely, spoiled, bossy, selfish? Read this book and find out.

Despite the personal distress and pressure to have a second baby, the number of women having an only child has more than doubled in the last two decades. What most people don’t realize is that one-child families outnumber families with two children and have for more than two decades. In major metropolitan areas like New York, 30 percent of families have a singleton. Throughout the country people are following suit. And it’s no wonder why:

  • The worrisome biological clock (secondary infertility; older mothers)
  • Downtrodden job markets
  • How mothers working affects everyone in the family
  • Finances and housing and costs of education

These are only the few things that parents today (and parents to be) contend with when deciding to start a family and determining whether or not to stop after one. The time is right for a book that addresses the emerging type of nuclear family, one that consists of a solo child. Popular Psychology Today blogger and parenting author of fifteen books, including the groundbreaking Parenting the Only Child, Susan Newman, Ph.D., grew impatient with the pervasiveness of only-child folklore masquerading as fact and offers the latest findings about the long-term effects of being raised as a singleton. In The Case for the Only Child, Newman walks parents (and future parents) through the long list of factors working for and against them as well as highlights the many positive aspects of raising and being a singleton. The aim of this book is to ease and guide parents through the process of determining what they want. Although each situation is unique, the profound confusion surrounding having a second child is similar. It is one of the most difficult and life-altering choices parents face. Adding to one’s family dramatically changes one’s life and the life of one’s firstborn forever. What will a person give up in time, money, freedom, intimacy, and job advancement with another child in the household? What will they gain? The Case for the Only Child helps explore and resolve these perplexing questions.  

My review: When I saw this book available for TLC’s book tour, I jumped at the chance to read it. Brett and I are 99% sure we are done having children and that Sammie will be our only child. Parenthood has been wonderful for us but Sammie has had a lot of health issues that required a lot of time, energy and money. Most of all though, our family feels complete just the three of us. I decided to participate in this tour to read the book because I feel a lot of residual guilt over not having more children because I feel like we are supposed to have at least two – I don’t know I feel this way, but I do.

With this book targeted at one-child families it is to be expected that it was biased towards this borderline to a fault. At times it felt so pro one-child that it almost mocked and/or disrespected those who have more than one child. I understand that being pro anything can make it hard to not appear anti the opposite. For the most part, this book read more that it is ok to only have one child rather than pro one child but a few chapters blurred that a bit.

However, if you are considering being a one-child family, this book is a good read. It does evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of this type of family unit. It also discusses a few of the studies that have been published relating to health and social skills for the only child versus siblings. I thought this was interesting, even though we haven’t really looked at studies for our reasons for leaning towards our one-child family. In all, this book didn’t sell me on only having one child, but it did lower my level of guilt and my feeling of being an oddity. If you are considering only having one child, this book is worth a read.

I am giving away one copy of this book – enter in the form below!

 Check out a few other stops on this book tour:

Wednesday, June 8th:  Chaotic Compendiums
Thursday, June 9th:  Life in Review
Monday, June 13th:  Redheaded Book Child
Thursday, June 16th:  Patricia’s Wisdom
Monday, June 20th:  Life is Short. Read Fast
Tuesday, June 21st:  I’m Booking It
Monday, June 27th:  Helen’s Book Blog
Tuesday, June 28th:  Girls Gone Reading
Thursday, June 30th:  Stacy’s Books
Tuesday, July 5th:  Overstuffed

Sig

Review: The Geek Dad’s Guide to Weekend Fun: Cool Hacks, Cutting-Edge Games, and More Awesome Projects for the Whole Family by Ken Denmead

Publisher: Gotham
Release Date: May 3, 2011
Format: E-book
Pages: 240
Source: Publisher via NetGalley

From Goodreads: Ken Denmead struck a chord with parents and kids across America with his GeekDad blog on Wired.com, which receives more than one million page views per month. His debut book, Geek Dad, was on bestseller lists and in its seventh printing just two months after hitting store shelves. With The Geek Dad’s Guide to Weekend Fun, he keeps the nerdtastic novelties coming, with projects that teach readers how to:

•Build homemade robots from scratch
•Write and direct simple stop-motion movies
•Hack into mechanical toys to add cool electronic twists, and more

United by the premise that to really understand science and how something works you must design and build it yourself or remake it better, Geek Parents everywhere will celebrate this latest installment of weekend workshop wonders.

My review: My Dad is an engineer and my Mom is a computer/programmer/creative type nerd so growing up we were always surrounded with nerd references and parts of items. The author writes about geeky quotes from movies, including “Make is so Number One” of which still comes out of my Dad’s mouth at least once a month, if not once a week. My husband is a handy/science/cooking type nerd and I am the book/glasses wearing nerd so when I saw this book available on NetGalley I knew I had to request it! We are raising our daughter to allow creativity and science (read: geek) exploration – showing her that being a geek is cool!

This book is a great resource for parents to demonstrate how fun science can be, but also how being a geek is cool. Many of the activities are beyond my daughter’s age (2); I plan to incorporate some of these projects into weekends as she grows up. One we are considering trying out now is the dry-ice ice cream. Who doesn’t love this fun treat on a hot summer day?

If you are a parent, especially of middle school children, this book would be a great addition to your home library. Embrace your inner geek and show your child how fun science can be, and how simple objects can be a great tool for demonstrating how important science is.

Sig

Review: Sippy Cups Are Not for Chardonnay: And Other Things I Had to Learn as a New Mom by Stefanie Wilder-Taylor


From Goodreads: The moment the second line on the pee stick turns pink, women discover they’ve entered a world of parenting experts.
Friends, family, colleagues, the UPS delivery guy — suddenly everybody is a trove of advice, much of it contradictory and confusing. With dire warnings of what will happen if baby is fed on demand and even direr warnings of what will happen if he isn’t, not to mention hordes of militant “lactivists,” cosleeping advocates, and books on what to worry about next, modern parenthood can seem like a minefield. In busy Mom-friendly short essays, Sippy Cups Are Not for Chardonnay delivers the empathetic straight dirt on parenting, tackling everything from Mommy & Me classes (“Your baby doesn’t need to be making friends at three months old — you do! But not with people you’ll meet at Mommy & Me”) to attachment parenting (“If you’re holding your baby 24/7, that’s not a baby, that’s a tumor”). Stefanie Wilder-Taylor combines practical tips with sidesplitting humor and refreshing honesty, assuring women that they can be good mothers and responsibly make their own choices. A witty and welcome antidote to trendy parenting texts and scarifying case studies, Sippy Cups Are Not for Chardonnay provides genuine support, encouragement, and indispensable common-sense advice.

My Review: This has been on my TBR list since we started trying for Sammie over two years ago and in hindsight, I am probably glad I didn’t read it until now. I was able to get so much more of the humor having been through the newborn phase, the baby food phase and into the temper-tantrum phase. I was laughing hysterically throughout this book, from the comments on the overbearing lactation consultants in the hospital to the politics of playdates at the park. Don’t be fooled by the title, there are serious parts to this book as well. The author was singing the same song as me when it came to her breastfeeding struggles and her eventual decision to save her sanity and move on to formula. While Stefanie Wilder-Taylor writes in a lighthearted fashion her thoughts hit home, even those that I disagreed with. She truly provides a range of opinions and jokes about almost every aspect of the late stages of pregnancy through the first year of parenthood. This would be a great read for a new parent who is at that ledge of complete exhausting and stress. It would provide an amazing breath of fresh air in laughter, while providing a sort of comfort that it does get better!

Grade: C.

Finished: July 10, 2010. 2010 Count: 59.

Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret by Judy Blume 

I read this as a young girl and it spawned by obsession with Judy Blume and all her wonderful wisdom for a girl struggling with adolescence. I wanted to re-read this gem so when it was available on PBS, I ordered pronto! Of course, this was a quick read but I still love it. I love how she experiences religions and tries to figure that world out by trial and error, without prejudice and judgment. As a young girl who was raised without religion, I found such a connection with Margaret and must admit that she helped start my own experiments with the religious world. One of my favorite parts is when Margaret stands up to her Grandparents when they are labeling her a religion just because she was born to a woman who was baptized. I had such pride in her rejection of this notion and her very loud outspokenness that she isn't anything. As we plan to parent our daughter with the open environment needed to foster experiments in the religious world, I truly hope that she has this same attitude and will be able to stand up for herself in the same manor and with the same conviction. This is a classic pretween book and I look forward to the day I can give Samantha the Judy Blume collection! 

Finished: January 22, 2010. 2010 Count: 6!

Raising Freethinkers: A Practical Guide for Parenting Beyond Belief by Dale MacGowan


This.Book.Is.Amazing! Having read Parenting Beyond Belief, I was very excited to get Dale McGowan’s next book. This has lived up to PBB and more! Since Samantha is not very old yet, much of this book doesn’t apply to us yet, but we know it will. I have about 20 sticky notes marking activities, tips and websites for our next few years of parenting. This book not only increases my anticipation for Sammie’s youth, it makes me feel more prepared for raising her with our pro-science, pro-reality, pro-critical thinking and free-thinking environment.

On a side note, I actually met Dale McGowan in Washington, D.C. during the 2007 annual Atheist Alliance International meeting. I sat through a class/lecture about parenting that he and a few others (Julia Sweeney for one!) led…it was wonderful! He is as nice and passionate about this style of parenting in person, as he is in the books. I am deeply appreciative of the insight and tips that these free-thinkers have provided to us in these books and that class.

I highly recommend Raising Freethinkers and Parenting Beyond Belief to anyone who wants to raise their children with the freedom to decide if and/or what they believe in when it comes to religion. Also, check out Dale McGowan’s blog: The Meming of Life

Finished: January 10, 2010. 2010 Count: 3.